Comparison
Atlast vs LinkedIn Recruiter
LinkedIn Recruiter finds candidates on one platform. Atlast sources across multiple platforms and then runs the entire hiring workflow from the same place.
| Feature | LinkedIn Recruiter | Atlast |
|---|---|---|
| Sourcing beyond LinkedIn | No | Yes |
| Outreach campaigns | InMail only | Yes — multi-channel |
| Candidate scoring and shortlisting | No | Yes |
| Built-in ATS and pipeline | No | Yes |
| Interview scheduling (automatic) | No | Yes |
| CV scoring with explainability | No | Yes |
| Interview recording and debrief | No | Yes |
| Intake form builder | No | Yes |
| AI job description creation | No | Yes |
| Candidate portal | No | Yes |
| Referral portal | No | Yes |
| EU AI Act compliance and audit trail | No | Yes |
| Careers page | No | Yes |
| Priced per recruiter seat | Yes — ~€8,000/seat/yr | No — whole team included |
| Covers full hiring workflow end to end | No | Yes |
LinkedIn Recruiter Corporate costs approximately €8,000 per recruiter seat per year and sources candidates on LinkedIn only. It has no pipeline, scheduling, scoring or candidate comms features. Atlast includes sourcing across multiple platforms plus the full hiring workflow for the same cost or less.